Blockchains Everest: Scaling DeFis Future Today

The promise of blockchain technology to revolutionize industries from finance to supply chain management hinges on its ability to scale. While the core blockchain architecture offers security and transparency, its initial designs often struggle to handle the transaction volumes required for mainstream adoption. Blockchain scaling is the critical challenge of increasing a blockchain’s throughput and efficiency without sacrificing its core tenets: decentralization, security, and transparency. Let’s dive into the intricacies of scaling blockchains and the various solutions being explored.

The Blockchain Scaling Problem: A Bottleneck to Adoption

Transaction Throughput Limitations

Traditional blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum have inherent limitations in the number of transactions they can process per second (TPS). Bitcoin, for example, typically handles around 7 TPS, while Ethereum handles about 15-20 TPS. Compare this to centralized payment processors like Visa, which can handle thousands of TPS, and the need for scaling becomes evident. This limited throughput can lead to network congestion, delayed transaction confirmations, and increased transaction fees, ultimately hindering user experience and adoption.

Network Congestion and High Fees

During periods of high demand, the network becomes congested as users compete to have their transactions included in the next block. This competition drives up transaction fees, making the blockchain less accessible and attractive for small-value transactions. The “CryptoKitties” incident on Ethereum in 2017, where the popularity of the digital collectibles clogged the network and significantly increased gas fees, serves as a prime example of this issue.

The Scalability Trilemma

The scalability trilemma posits that it is difficult to achieve all three key blockchain characteristics – decentralization, security, and scalability – simultaneously. Optimizing for one often comes at the expense of another. For instance, increasing the block size can improve throughput but may lead to centralization as fewer nodes can afford to store the larger blockchain. Similarly, compromising security for faster transaction times defeats the fundamental purpose of using a blockchain.

Layer-1 Scaling Solutions: Modifying the Base Protocol

Layer-1 scaling solutions involve directly modifying the blockchain’s core protocol to improve its performance. These changes can be fundamental and require broad consensus among network participants.

Increasing Block Size

• What it is: Increasing the maximum size of each block allows more transactions to be included, thereby increasing the overall TPS.
• Example: Bitcoin Cash (BCH) forked from Bitcoin, increasing the block size to 8MB (later to 32MB) to increase transaction throughput.
• Considerations: Larger blocks require more storage space and bandwidth, potentially leading to centralization as smaller nodes struggle to keep up with the increased requirements.

Sharding

• What it is: Sharding divides the blockchain into smaller, more manageable pieces called “shards.” Each shard operates independently and processes its own set of transactions.
• Example: Ethereum 2.0 (Serenity) plans to implement sharding to drastically increase its transaction throughput.
• Considerations: Sharding introduces complexity in coordinating between shards and ensuring data integrity across the network. Security concerns also arise as individual shards may be more vulnerable to attacks.

Changing Consensus Mechanisms

• What it is: Switching from computationally intensive consensus mechanisms like Proof-of-Work (PoW) to more efficient alternatives like Proof-of-Stake (PoS) or Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) can significantly improve transaction speed and reduce energy consumption.
• Example: Ethereum transitioned from PoW to PoS through “The Merge,” leading to significantly reduced energy consumption and laying the groundwork for further scaling improvements.
• Considerations: Changing the consensus mechanism requires careful consideration to maintain security and prevent centralization. Different consensus mechanisms have their own trade-offs and vulnerabilities.

Layer-2 Scaling Solutions: Building on Top of the Blockchain

Layer-2 scaling solutions operate on top of the existing blockchain, without altering its core protocol. These solutions offload some of the transaction processing to separate networks, reducing the burden on the main chain.

State Channels

• What it is: State channels allow participants to conduct multiple transactions off-chain and only settle the final state on the main blockchain.
• Example: Lightning Network on Bitcoin enables fast and low-cost Bitcoin transactions by creating payment channels between users.
• Benefits:

Increased transaction speed

Reduced transaction fees

Improved privacy

Increased throughput

Lower gas fees compared to mainnet transactions

Improved scalability without compromising security

• Considerations: Optimistic Rollups have a challenge period, which can delay withdrawals. ZK-Rollups are more complex to implement but offer faster finality.

Sidechains

• What it is: Sidechains are separate blockchains that are linked to the main blockchain, allowing assets and data to be transferred between them.
• Example: Polygon (Matic) is a popular sidechain for Ethereum, providing faster and cheaper transactions.
• Benefits:

Increased throughput

Customizable blockchain parameters

Experimentation with new features without affecting the main chain

Improved scalability through workload distribution

Greater flexibility and customization

Increased network effects

• Considerations: Interoperability solutions introduce complexity in terms of security and governance.

Data Compression and Optimization

• What it is: Techniques to reduce the amount of data that needs to be stored and processed on the blockchain.
• Examples: State pruning, which removes historical data that is no longer needed.
• Benefits:

Reduced storage requirements

Improved transaction processing speed

Increased scalability

Improved transaction processing speed

Reduced energy consumption (compared to traditional CPUs)

Increased scalability

• Considerations: Can lead to centralization if only a few entities can afford the specialized hardware.

Conclusion

Blockchain scaling remains a critical area of research and development. While no single solution is universally applicable, the combination of Layer-1, Layer-2, and other innovative approaches is paving the way for blockchains to handle the demands of a growing user base and a wider range of applications. As the technology matures and new solutions emerge, the potential for blockchain to revolutionize industries across the globe will only continue to grow. The ongoing advancements in scaling solutions are crucial for realizing the full potential of decentralized technologies.

Read our previous article: Techs Next Horizon: Decentralized Futures And AI Ethics

For more details, see Investopedia on Cryptocurrency.